For popular or very good threads
Yeah, you know I'm a fan of living life in moderation. Too much of anything, including spirituality/religion, can be harmful or just unsatisfactory. I think of the Catholic priests or the alcoholic. One life is too dull while the other is probably too wild.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Multicolored Lemur
One life is too dull while the other is probably too wild.
I’ll tell you. I think some kind of “morning devotional,” broadly defined, is probably a good thing. Even if it’s just doing a tad bit of gardening, or maybe just letting ideas percolate as you put on the coffee, shower, get dressed.

As I think I’ve mentioned, I like low doses of legal Delta-8 marijuana. Kind of as a pleasure enhancer of what else I have going on. I encourage people to look up from reputable sites, What is the low dose for anxiety reduction? I know, but U want you to hear from a more dependable source. And with a gummie edible, it takes about 3 to 4 hours for me to get max effect.
 
Last edited:

1 There is therefore now no condemnation to them which are in Christ Jesus, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit.
this is broadly, i guess universally? translated as “to them,” when i suggest that “from them” might be more easily established, but you decide, https://biblehub.com/lexicon/romans/8-1.htm

There is, after all, plenty of condemnation to them who are in Christ, which the Bible even details, even if it doesnt come from Yah; but i mean Jesus was crucified, after all? So im writing this mostly for those who suffer some human condemnation for following Christ as best they know how, bc it is def gonna happen, right
2 For the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus hath made me free from the law of sin and death.

3 For what the law could not do, in that it was weak through the flesh, God sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and for sin, condemned sin in the flesh:

4 That the righteousness of the law might be fulfilled in us, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit.

5 For they that are after the flesh do mind the things of the flesh; but they that are after the Spirit the things of the Spirit.

6 For to be carnally minded is death; but to be spiritually minded is life and peace.

7 Because the carnal mind is enmity against God: for it is not subject to the law of God, neither indeed can be.

8 So then they that are in the flesh cannot please God.

9 But ye are not in the flesh, but in the Spirit, if so be that the Spirit of God dwell in you. Now if any man have not the Spirit of Christ, he is none of his.

10 And if Christ be in you, the body is dead because of sin; but the Spirit is life because of righteousness.

11 But if the Spirit of him that raised up Jesus from the dead dwell in you, he that raised up Christ from the dead shall also quicken your mortal bodies by his Spirit that dwelleth in you.

12 Therefore, brethren, we are debtors, not to the flesh, to live after the flesh.

13 For if ye live after the flesh, ye shall die: but if ye through the Spirit do mortify the deeds of the body, ye shall live.

14 For as many as are led by the Spirit of God, they are the sons of God.

.

.

— King James Version

==========

Alright, like poetry, encouragement can use the method of repeating. Or, multiple copies of Paul’s letter(s) to the Romans were circulating, and the editor erred on the side of including rather than not including.

and . . .

Please notice verse 3 “ . . his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh . . ” Not flesh, but likeness. And if Christian started as a mystery religion with the action takint place in Heaven? And was late moved to Earth and that’s what grabbed people’s attention?

Paul’s letters were written before the Gospel. And his letters are sparse regarding details about Jesus’s life.
i understand the perception of Jesus as literal, a literal person, but Christ is Spirit, so said to “come down from heaven,” and i think we have many clues that suggest Jesus is better understood as mythology, rather than literal. Regardless, we are told where the body of Christ is, right? Where the carcass is, there the vultures (eagles) will gather
—————-/——-

Maybe it did start as a mystery faith with a big cosmic battle between good and evil.

When the dividing line between good and evil is within each of us. And being optimistic, the average person is about 70% good. :p

————————

About the possibility that the story of Christ first took place in Heaven, this is something I’ve read. It’s not original. However, I do find it intriguing.
Christ is a concept that more or less goes against our very natures, right? Now why Yah would have chosen the meanest monkeys in the jungle to invest in is initially kinda hard to understand, but eventually starts to make sense, imo
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Multicolored Lemur
i understand the perception of Jesus as literal, a literal person, but Christ is Spirit, so said to “come down from heaven,” and i think we have many clues that suggest Jesus is better understood as mythology,

For me personally, I got all the way into an evangelical form of Christianity as a teenager. So, I kind of needed to get all the way out.

Most people just don’t take religion that seriously, and I kind of admire them. They kind of know, don’t go there, keep a light touch, it’s inspiring stories as long as you don’t look at them too closely.

And anywhere a person lands on this “serious-ness” spectrum is perfectly okay with me.

A lot of people early on gravitate to the position that, A lot different churches teach a lot of different things. And even more broadly, Mosques, Synagogues, Temples. With religion, we have even a broader class of different things being taught.

“Most people are not religious, but some are.”

And this is a relaxed position has taken me years to wind my way to.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: bbyrd009
i understand the perception of Jesus as literal, a literal person, but Christ is Spirit, so said to “come down from heaven,” and i think we have many clues that suggest Jesus is better understood as mythology,

For me personally, I got all the way into an evangelical form of Christianity as a teenager. So, I kind of needed to get all the way out.

Most people just don’t take religion that seriously, and I kind of admire them. They kind of know, don’t go there, keep a light touch, it’s inspiring stories as long as you don’t look at them too closely.

And anywhere a person lands on this “serious-ness” spectrum is perfectly okay with me.

A lot of people early on gravitate to the position that, A lot different churches teach a lot of different things. And even more broadly, Mosques, Synagogues, Temples. With religion, we have even a broader class of different things being taught.

“Most people are not religious, but some are.”

And this is a relaxed position has taken me years to wind my way to.
off topic,

Then the end will come, when He hands the kingdom over to the Father, after He has destroyed all rulers, powers, and authority

We organize around a competitive trinity, government religion science, and its interesting to me how these have progressed in my lifetime; all three could reasonably be said to be in shambles now, whereas i was born (62) at basically the apex, of science at least.

on topic

Hope deferred makes the heart sick

Is surely not an accidental inclusion, and i derive from basically the same tree you mention above. While i now more or less live and let live, maybe since what remains of my nuclear family is still pretty religious—waiting for rapture, etc—i detected a sickness quite early on, among these religious ppl who def have a hope, that are tbh earnest, good hearted ppl, better hearted than me even.

So, we get along well enough, mostly bc i refuse to meaningfully engage when they try to re-evangelize, but i can tell it is a sore spot with them, esp since they otherwise kind of respect some aspect of my intelligence, i guess? Now, ive never done to them what i did with Scooter, or ill say maybe only very lightly, but they were never much into digging pits for others to fall into, either.

But they are nonetheless meat eaters, so to speak—which i was too, for a long time, forty years or so—and i guess im writing this to point out the commonalities between meat eaters of any stripe, whether they be religious, political, or scientific. Ive learned to function around them, mostly by playing dumb and freezing my face, but women (my fam) are naturally more attuned, and that doesnt work so well with them; they can read my silences, iow

I say all this bc Paul and Jesus make many couched statements about the religious, that as near i can tell the religious do not understand or misinterpret, like the “absent from the body” passage or the making of the eating the fruit of knowledge into an apparent compliment, at Paul’s milk/meat passage,

And imo its pretty easy to even relate believers (again, of whatever stripe) to goats rather than sheep (a*gnostics), just based upon what they say they know. So, while im busy doing basically the exact opposite lol, i would give a warning here about religious ppl, esp if their mouths are open graves. Choose life, imo.

Waiting for Jesus is a death sentence, and not supported by the Bible any kind of way. There is a reason that the enlightened were advised against mixing with other tribes in the OT, and what is sweet to the mouth is bitter to the stomach, and vice versa.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Multicolored Lemur
So, we get along well enough, mostly bc i refuse to meaningfully engage when they try to re-evangelize, but i can tell it is a sore spot with them, esp since they otherwise kind of respect some aspect of my intelligence, i guess?
Which in their world, is all the more disappointing in that you don’t realize the “obvious” truth of religion? Just guessing, they might view you as similar to a tone deaf person.

When people are that religious, is it a block to both friendship and family.

I think you do the right thing by refusing to engage in debate. Although I’m sure it still can hurt from time to time, and limits the amount of time you can productively spend with them or wish to.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bbyrd009
So, we get along well enough, mostly bc i refuse to meaningfully engage when they try to re-evangelize, but i can tell it is a sore spot with them, esp since they otherwise kind of respect some aspect of my intelligence, i guess?
Which in their world, is all the more disappointing in that you don’t realize the “obvious” truth of religion? Just guessing, they might view you as similar to a tone deaf person.
ezackly lol. They didnt receive the lack of hupo strepho thing very well, i guess of course? So i pretty much vowed to keep it all to myself after that. But also i guess of course being still in the cult of sol, they have more or less constant inconsistencies that pop up, so there’s this kinda weird dynamic goin on where i mostly have to work on my smugness lol
When people are that religious, is it a block to both friendship and family.
Just like the Bible says, huh? I went to Jerusalem and hung out with Muslims, although i found some Jewish friends too, and that was better received than i hoped. Which kind of set the tone, we all just more or less ignore each others beliefs now. Or in my case lack of them.

Im prolly lucky there in that ive always been crying when theyre laughing etc, so they were kinda used to me going my own way anyway
I think you do the right thing by refusing to engage in debate. Although I’m sure it still can hurt from time to time, and limits the amount of time you can productively spend with them or wish to.
Ya…fortunately they are not brand new converts, so it isnt like a constant chore now. Plus ive found Jesus, whereas they are still waiting for Him? Which its hard to splain how that changes the dynamic, since on the one hand i no longer have the existential dread, but on the other i have surrender in situations they usually seek to control.

And we’re all quite codependent too. I wish i could say i wasnt, but after youve been raised that way i guess all you can really do is be aware of it? But that is also a relationship factor. A weird thing about not being interested in teaching anyone is that then you get sought out, and saying stuff like “i cant tell you that” worked at first but now they—my two girls, not the others in the room—have figured out that that is my speaking-in-tongues way of saying “you cant hear that yet,” so im usually having to find new dodges and ways to plant seeds, to ordained pastors no less.

And idk how i got to sixty without realizing that no one really likes anyone perceived as smarter than themselves? Schopenhauer, i think? I found agnosticism years ago which is similar, but different. Youve seen the meme about “Idk anything, ever.” “No problem, ill show you that you know lots of stuff” lol, so i still go through that about once a week.

But im learning to ask pointed questions that i really already know the answers to—as innocently as possible, since ive already been caught there—“Saved, from what?” being the most recent (to the pastor), and then just relying on the Bible for the answer, since that can be found corporately iow, or even later when theyre alone.

Life was a minefield when i was younger though, definitely. It can still be a chore sometimes, but im pretty surrendered at this point, usually. Rapture is still a button though, apparently. lol.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Multicolored Lemur
Plus ive found Jesus, whereas they are still waiting for Him? Which its hard to splain how that changes the dynamic, since on the one hand i no longer have the existential dread, but on the other i have surrender in situations they usually seek to control.
maybe in Buddhist fashion?

as in accepting current reality, being present in the “here and now,” etc
 
  • Like
Reactions: bbyrd009
Plus ive found Jesus, whereas they are still waiting for Him? Which its hard to splain how that changes the dynamic, since on the one hand i no longer have the existential dread, but on the other i have surrender in situations they usually seek to control.
maybe in Buddhist fashion?

as in accepting current reality, being present in the “here and now,” etc
ya…the Bible forwards many Buddhists principles, Jesus even invokes “the way.” But it seems like it only mentions them in passing? “Today” is really only mentioned in one passage, maybe? Ok, a couple other places, but as the subject really only Heb 3.