Ajay0

Member
Feb 17, 2022
19
14
Declassified pentagon files have suggested the possibility that reincarnation is real based on data derived from its research projects.




A study conducted by US Army Intelligence has suggested that reincarnation is real because consciousness 'never dies.'

Entitled 'Analysis and Assessment of The Gateway Process,' the 29-page report was drafted by US Army Lieutenant Colonel Wayne M McDonnell in 1983 and declassified by the CIA in 2003.

'Consciousness is energy and it exists outside of our understanding of reality,' Holocomb said, paraphrasing page 19 of McDonnell's Army intel report. 'And energy... never dies.'

The mind-bending official Pentagon study was commissioned to better understand what its Army intel colleagues were doing sending personnel to a small institute in Charlottesville, Virginia that was working on the 'Gateway Experience.'

The then-secretive 'Gateway' project, based to McDonnell's analysis, was 'a training system designed to bring enhanced strength, focus and coherence... to alter consciousness.'

From there, Gateway's ambitious goal was to shift the practitioner's consciousness 'outside the physical sphere so as to ultimately escape even the restrictions of time and space.'

At least according to McDonnell, the Monroe Institute's discoveries that wound up bolstering the case for reincarnation were profound.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Multicolored Lemur
I wanted to check out the claims, starting with if this information was part of any CIA inquiry, and I did find a copy...CIA.gov

The text is hard to read so I used the find function to search for keywords. Here's some of the claims or views I saw that's related to your articles:

When consciousness reaches a state of sophistication in which it can perceive itself(its own hologram) it reaches the point of self cognition. Human beings have this form of elevated consciousness as does the Absolute but in case of the latter, it is a function of energy and its associated quality of consciousness in infinity(omniscience and omnipotence in perceptual unity). When energy returns to a state of total rest within the Absolute, it returns to the continuum of consciousness in the pool of limitless, timeless perception that resides there.
Our consciousness, therefore, is that differentiated aspect of the universal consciousness which resides within the Absolute. It accounts for the organization of the energy patterns which constitute our physical body but is distinctly separate from and superior to it. Since consciousness exists quite apart from and outside of reality, beyond the bounds of time-space, it, like the Absolute, has neither beginning nor end. Reality has both a beginning and an end because it is bounded within time-space, but the fundamental quantum of energy and its associated consciousness is eternal.
- CIA.gov

The only science investigation to test this, assuming it was a valid controlled test, was called the Gateway Experience which involve the following,
Some of these mind-altering techniques are relatively mainstream, such as hypnosis or transcendental meditation—a practice actively advocated for by film director David Lynch. Other ideas are a bit further afield, such as biofeedback (the ability for one hemisphere of the brain to gain control of parts of the other hemisphere) and an idea known as “The Consciousness Matrix,”
source: https://www.popularmechanics.com/military/research/a63149552/pentagon-psychic-spies/

What I'd want to know is what scientific evidence backs this view in any way. What results came out of using this technique?


Now that just speaks to scientific study, but what about the scientific perspective on consciousness based on what we do know? Anything supports these timeless and limitless consciousness - as well as reincarnation?

Based on the scientific perspective, I accept that consciousness may be non-physical or is unlike any other physical thing in the Universe, and that's because subjective experience can't be observed from the third-person. Again, every other physical thing in the Universe can be observed via the third-person pov which is part of why can even do science to begin with and have multiple observers being able to observe the same thing and repeat experiments, corroborate findings and observations, etc.

In my view, consciousness being nonphysical can open the door to things like reincarnation, survival beyond bodily death, etc. But I usually don't go further than what the evidence shows, unless I am looking at things from a theoretical perspective - assuming that it is true just to play out what it would mean.

Interesting topic Ajay0.
 
Last edited:
I think we are watching the blueprint for investigating anomalous events (including supernatural events) play out in this century. And by that I mean watching how the investigation into UFOs (now called Unidentified Anomalous Phenomenon) play out.

The first key thing I've learned is that science should be open to investigating ANY phenomenon. The fact that science was closed to certain things was a big mistake by science because it hinders knowledge not to mention it leads to a biased narrative about the world, the one we think it should be as opposed to being whatever the evidence says it should be.

The second thing is that some of these phenomenon need to be studied by people of different backgrounds instead of leaving it up to lone skeptical researchers who are only looking to debunk. To borrow from X- Files show, we need both a Mulder (the curious investigator) AND Skully (the technical scientist) looking into these cases. Really, the supernatural should be treated no differently than natural phenomenon, where we have scientists that are willing to take the subject matter seriously instead of being dismissive or skeptical.

Just my two cents.
 
To borrow from X- Files show, we need both a Mulder (the curious investigator) AND Skully (the technical scientist) looking into these cases.
leaving philosophy for just a moment, and looking at the storytelling aspect . . .

did they kind of switch roles every 10 episodes or so, with Dana Skully falling quick and hard for a supernatural explanation and Mulder saying, Wait a minute, there has to be a logical explanation?

that occasional, every so often, subtly switch, I think would make for a good episode. Maybe would add a little richness to each character, When is Skully gullible to believe? etc
 
  • Like
Reactions: AgnosticBoy
leaving philosophy for just a moment, and looking at the storytelling aspect . . .

did they kind of switch roles every 10 episodes or so, with Dana Skully falling quick and hard for a supernatural explanation and Mulder saying, Wait a minute, there has to be a logical explanation?

that occasional, every so often, subtly switch, I think would make for a good episode. Maybe would add a little richness to each character, When is Skully gullible to believe? etc
Yes, they did switch roles occasionally. Like any ole popular show involving a man and woman, the two ended up sleeping with each other, and well so, Scully might have been a lil biased at that point. :) Either way, it made for an interesting balance.

I think that's what we need when approaching these matters. Having too many Scully's would lead to too much skepticism and probably just downright dismissal, which is what we been going through for decades when it comes to paranormal stuff. Sure, some of the loony tin foil conspiracy theorists don't help make these events believable either, but there are some reasonable people that have seen things that they can't explain.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Multicolored Lemur
Really, the supernatural should be treated no differently than natural phenomenon, where we have scientists that are willing to take the subject matter seriously instead of being dismissive or skeptical.
I think young scientists are discouraged rather than forbidden.

And if I may use an analogy, 8 out of 10 new businesses go out of business. The trick is starting the business out of your home or car, and testing it on the cheap if you possibly can! Because, no matter how talented and hardworking you are, there are luck and timing factors.

So, if a scientist hears of a haunted house . . .

Maybe it’s worth a couple of Saturdays’ of research, or maybe even the whole weekend. But for the sake of this younger scientist’s career, he or she really should pick things more likely to work out.
 
Last edited:
I’m sure the report must be true. The government would never mislead or outright lie to the American people.