- New World Encyclopedia
I hear a lot of biblical scholars claim that the Christ Myth theory has no validity and that it is an old debunked theory. Yet, it keeps popping up among skeptics. I admit that some of the myth theories I've encountered are similar to conspiracy theories in terms of the details and the approach behind them. Historian Richard Carrier made a similar point, but it was about a different issue:
- Richard Carrier, The Nazareth InscriptionThe Nazareth Inscription provides no evidence for Christianity or its claim of an empty tomb. It contains no new or unusual laws regarding graverobbing, the decree itself is not unique, and it has no references or direct links to Christianity of any kind. Moreover, it’s date is most likely pre-Christian, its origin is not likely to be Nazareth, and its contents are not explainable even as a muddled imperial reaction to the theft of Jesus’ body. To tie this to Christianity requires piling dozens of conjectures onto scores of speculations, and the rejection of a good supply of contrary indications and evidence, and none of this is either necessary or reasonable.
Couldn't we also apply a lot of his points to the Christ Myth theory? Ironically, Richard Carrier also has his own Christ Myth theory (or here).
For discussion:
1. Why does the Christ Myth theory keep coming up? Have biblical scholars not addressed it enough?
2. What books or articles deal with this topic? Please list any you know about. Also, let me know of any good debates on that topic!
Last edited: