Search results

Your question about my religious affiliation has nothing to do with the topic of this thread, has nothing to do with the scriptures that I presented (since I quoted from several different Trinitarian Bibles), and will not affect your answers to the six YES or NO questions that I asked you...

I responded to that question twice in this thread already. You and Scooter have chosen to ignore that reply because it doesn't line up with what you've both chosen to believe. God is a spirit. Angels are also spirits. Humans are flesh and blood. So your argument that humans are literally...

You are presenting the same argument that you presented when you used the occasion of Jesus' baptism at Matthew 3:16-17. QUESTION #6 to SCOOTER: The presence of your father, you, and something owned by your father does not equate to all three of you being the same human being. TRUE or FALSE...

Scooter: The words at 1 John 5:7 that I bolded in red are fabrications found only in the King James Bible. Those extra words are referred to as the Comma Johanneum. Thousands of existing Trinitarian Bibles have avoided those words because they do not appear in the oldest known manuscripts of...

No, you have not, Scooter. I will remind you of the scriptures you've presented thus far and follow each one with a question or questions. POST #13: The claim by Trinitarians is that the mere presence of three entities at the same time equates to the three being the same god. That's like...

Trying to change the goal post to religious affiliation is what desperate people do when they realize they are being outdone by scripture. Keep asking. And then hold your breath waiting for the answer. Ready, set, go!

Correction. You dodged the issue. The verse clearly says Jesus is the firstBORN of all CREATION. Jesus is a created being. Colossians 1:15 says he is among other created beings but that he was the first among them all.

Scooter: You shot yourself in the foot when you quoted Colossians 1:13-14. Look at the words that I enlarged and bolded in red within your above post. Do you realize the significance of those words? Those words provide confirmation that Jesus is not God in the flesh because they're telling...

Scooter: Colossians 1:15 says in plain language that Jesus is a created being by describing him as "firstborn of all creation"--meaning he did not always exist. The trinitarian claim that Jesus has always existed has been debunked by that single verse of scripture. Of course there are many...

Read between the lines. Meanwhile, suppose you address the scripture I presented in my most recent posts. Or could it be that you are now playing the role of Artful Dodger?

Scooter: I didn't say it. The Bible did. So you don't have a leg to stand on with your attempt at dismissing me as a heretic. Why so? Because scripture says Jesus was the first angel created by Jehovah the Father. "The Son is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all...

Scooter, the laugh is on you in light of the fact scripture makes it clear that Jesus became fully human after his spirit life was transferred to the womb of the virgin named Mary. In other words, he was no longer a god at that point, no longer divine. Throughout the Christian Greek...

I previously informed you and Scooter that one of the angels that was already in existence at Genesis 1:26 aka Jesus Christ is the spirit person Jehovah was speaking to. Jehovah is in fact the only Creator. He worked through Jesus, so in reality, Jehovah was the power behind all creation...

AgnosticBoy: You are repeating yourself after I already responded to that false claim with scripture. I quoted scripture showing there were millions of spirit sons/angels in existence at Genesis 1:26 when Jehovah God used the word "us" as in "Let us make man in our image...." At this point, I...

It doesn't have to. Scripture says the angels were already in existence before Jehovah created the stars. Scripture further says humans were created AFTER the stars had already been created. So that makes it clear that the angels were in existence when the Almighty said at Genesis 1:26 "Let...

Genesis 1:26 used the term "us" because Almighty God was accompanied by millions of angelic sons. He was speaking to the special angel that came to be known as Jesus Christ. I've stated that previously in this thread, so I can't imagine what you hope to gain by repeating the same failed...

So what's your point? That God's wasn't also a spirit at Genesis 1:26 and that the Bible is not in harmony from one book to the next?

No, you didn't. The scriptures you quoted actually debunk Christendom's Trinity when the context is paid attention to. It is the context that gives the correct understanding of what is being stated.

Now you are contradicting yourself. You've already presented scripture which says point blank that humans are not able to see God. You sound confused. Make up your mind, Scooter. You can't argue on both sides of the fence.

They presented the same out-of-context verses. When I showed them the context (surrounded words, verses, and/or chapters) and they saw that they were debunked by the context, they dug in by presenting the same behavior that you are presenting here. When I asked them questions about what the...