Search results

  1. bbyrd009

    Featured Paul mentions that “more than 500” saw the risen Jesus in a single early letter, but included this in no other letters. Why ? ?

    i have a thing on that somewhere, lemme see if i can dig it up https://biblicalhistoricalcontext.com/israelite-origins/israelite-origins-putting-away-childish-things/ ya, so what i mean by “lies” is things written that are not literally true, and were never meant to be understood literally; so...
  2. bbyrd009

    Featured Paul mentions that “more than 500” saw the risen Jesus in a single early letter, but included this in no other letters. Why ? ?

    i think it goes that samaritans were considered atheists by devout Jews, whether they actually were or not? A Jew even talking to a Samaritan = stoning then, regardless, and we now basically have a lot of “good samaritan” journalism to overcome, when they were then considered strictly off limits...
  3. bbyrd009

    Featured Paul mentions that “more than 500” saw the risen Jesus in a single early letter, but included this in no other letters. Why ? ?

    well youd prolly get more reliable information by just typing “five” and “one hundred” into a Bible engine, but five is generally considered to be a number that reps something like “hand” whereas man is six, so a kind of reflection of man, maybe. Five is usually equated with grace, i think...
  4. bbyrd009

    Featured Paul mentions that “more than 500” saw the risen Jesus in a single early letter, but included this in no other letters. Why ? ?

    Jesus clowned the religious of His day, and praised the atheist (samaritan) and the pagan (roman centurion), so, ya (Try to do a lot of good in a lot of different ways.) is supposed to be in your post, but whenever i erase it the next one moves up here lol Well i def wouldnt suggest blindly...
  5. bbyrd009

    Featured Paul mentions that “more than 500” saw the risen Jesus in a single early letter, but included this in no other letters. Why ? ?

    bc everything you have purported to know here so far has turned out to be so accurate, right? lol ok, best of luck to you ok
  6. bbyrd009

    Featured Paul mentions that “more than 500” saw the risen Jesus in a single early letter, but included this in no other letters. Why ? ?

    The Bible plainly warns us that strong men will seize control, if they can and fwiw, sorry about this, ok? I realize that finding this out from some stranger on the internet seems pretty ridic lol. And there are, God help us, even pastors who are apparently blissfully unaware. Young ones...
  7. bbyrd009

    Featured Paul mentions that “more than 500” saw the risen Jesus in a single early letter, but included this in no other letters. Why ? ?

    i guess wikipedia would be a decent first approach? The Cult of Sol Invictus is technically the Roman Catholic congregation now, although Protestants have retained all of the basics. Amazing to me how…hidden in plain sight all that is, to virtually all believers; but then there just is no vested...
  8. bbyrd009

    Featured Paul mentions that “more than 500” saw the risen Jesus in a single early letter, but included this in no other letters. Why ? ?

    hey, so, progress. From you knowing all that stuff before, i mean i mean, Paul’s writings are very clear to you, but you didnt know that there was no “to be absent…?” ha cmon Scooter pls
  9. bbyrd009

    Featured Paul mentions that “more than 500” saw the risen Jesus in a single early letter, but included this in no other letters. Why ? ?

    i just edited back there fwiw; it usually takes me a minute to build a post, sorry but yes, the verse that never says “to be” in any translation, idt? point being that Paul is adept at putting stuff a certain way, so as to be easily misunderstood by the cult of sol invictus
  10. bbyrd009

    Featured Paul mentions that “more than 500” saw the risen Jesus in a single early letter, but included this in no other letters. Why ? ?

    You can no doubt recognize the sense in which since we are still talking about Jesus 2k years later, He has “risen” though. And your last sentence strikes me as a pretty good way of saying “no, you dont yet recognize Who Jesus is” maybe
  11. bbyrd009

    Featured Paul mentions that “more than 500” saw the risen Jesus in a single early letter, but included this in no other letters. Why ? ?

    https://biblehub.com/2_corinthians/5-8.htm idt its even ever xlated that way into English, Scooter. My fave rendition might be “We are cock-sure, i tell you, and would prefer to be dead, and partying with Jesus in heaven”
  12. bbyrd009

    oh, i dont watch it at all, fwiw; i was quoting someone else

    oh, i dont watch it at all, fwiw; i was quoting someone else
  13. bbyrd009

    Featured Paul mentions that “more than 500” saw the risen Jesus in a single early letter, but included this in no other letters. Why ? ?

    ah. Not aware of any problems in the Bible, that might be interesting. Problems understanding, maybe, i mean i have plenty of those lol realizing that i wasnt reading journalism helped a lot
  14. bbyrd009

    Featured The Gospel of Mark successfully reconciles 2 different versions of the Miracle of Loaves and Fishes

    5 and 12, 4 and 7 is a possible point, even if largely lost on us now?
  15. bbyrd009

    Featured Paul mentions that “more than 500” saw the risen Jesus in a single early letter, but included this in no other letters. Why ? ?

    hey, if they cant read Buried with Him in death, raised to new life in Him, baptism iow, thats on them right. We also have Galileans (the code word), why do you stand there looking up into the sky? which would be a perfectly logical response in a literal scenario, right. Anyway, “5” and “100”...
  16. bbyrd009

    Featured Is Hell a place for eternal punishment?

    well, not sure how useful i would be there, but post a link or whatever, im down
  17. bbyrd009

    Featured Is Hell a place for eternal punishment?

    ha ya, i know…its why i got called here i guess maybe i put that poorly; i am aware that the apparent contradictions in the Bible are surely deliberate, and lead to wisdom, while also hiding wisdom from the wise